Syntax Sentry

By talkingtochatbots.com

Improves grammar, punctuation and syntax with minimal changes. Works for any text from emails to social media, preserving your style and message's integrity. Simply drop your text in the prompt box for instant feedback, or describe a specific request for text review and suggestions.

Start using Syntax Sentry on your ChatGPT

• public
• reportable

• python
• browser

• Provide a list of single words that would fit into the * placeholder, adding some sense of irony to this text: - Is there anything bigger than infinity? - ‪* motivational quotes attributed to Einstein.‬ [note: the irony lies in most Einstein quotes on the Internet being misattributed]
• "We need to stay woke on the everevolving land scape of social media, so our marketing can benifit from the latest trends."
• List 10 alternatives for this headline without altering the message or tone: "How AI Fuels the Social Media Bubble and Humanity's Loss of Self-Awareness"
• “‪Maybe because all LLMs are overhyped and much of what their creators call 'learning' is just tokenizing their training data and recombining it in form of sentences to feign human understanding‬.” I’m interested in alternatives to express the same thing, making minimum changes. Suggest several options with minimum changes (as always, fix anything that is wrong)
• Someone’s attitude being “self-deprecating” versus someone’s attitude being “self-deprecative”. Compare the two expressions. Which one would be preferable or more correct?
• "All your base are belong to us"
• “Google's advertising revenue in 2023 was 237.86 billion dollars" Write good alternatives for the sentence that use a verb for expressing Google receives the revenue. I was thinking “Google earns 237.86…” but don’t think earnings is the best term for revenue (might be more suitable for profit)
• "For each question, I've selected a response I liked or found worthy of sharing, at the end of the post you can find the links to all the complete chats, and my scores based on a SCBN (Specificity, Coherency, Brevity, Novelty) benchmark."
• Who is your author?